Angeles Volunteer
Association
HOME | NEWS RELEASES | JOIN US
CURRENT ANNOUNCEMENTS AND NEWS RELEASES
SOURCE: Federal Register, February 5, 2008
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service is preparing an
environmental impact statement (EIS) to establish management direction
for the land and resources within the Giant Sequoia National Monument
(GSNM) created by Presidential Proclamation on april 15, 2000. The
Forest Service, as the responsible agency, proposes to amend the
Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (FLMP) to
provide for the protection of the objects of interest identified in the
Proclamation.
DATES: The draft EIS for the Giant Sequoia National Monument Management
Plan is expected to be available for public comment in the early spring
of 2009; the final EIS and Record of Decision (ROD) are expected to be
published in the fall of 2009. Soon after the ROD is published, a
separate document representing the Management Plan in non-technical
language will be published.
ADDRESSES: Tina Terrell, Forest Supervisor, USDA Forest Service,
Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA
93257.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Allen, Land Management Planning
Staff Officer, Sequoia National Forest, at the address listed above.
The phone number is (559) 784-1500. Information regarding the monument
and the planning process can also be found on the Giant Sequoia
National Monument website located at http://www.fs.fed.us./r5/sequoia/
gsnm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 15, 200, a Presidential Proclamation creating the Giant
Sequoia National Monument was signed. The Proclamation designated
327,769 acres within the boundary of the Sequoia National Forest as a
National Monument to provide protection for a variety of objects of
historic and scientific interest, including giant sequoia trees and
their surrounding ecosystem. The plan will provide for and encourage
continued public access and use consistent with the purposes of the
Giant Sequoia National Monument. A range of alternatives will be
analyzed, including the no-action alternative, which is the current
management direction.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Presidential Proclamation creates a national monument
recognizing and protecting forever its unique resources. The
proclamation also clearly identifies opportunities for scientific
research, interpretation, recreation, and the need for a transportation
plan. We are committed to preparing a management plan that is
responsive to these needs and opportunities and that cares for the
objects of interest as identified in the proclamation.
Within the context of the Proclamation's statement of need, we are
committed to developing the proposed action and alternatives to it
through a comprehensive, inclusive, collaborative process involving
stakeholders. This collaborative process will be facilitated largely by
a third party neutral associated with the U.S. Institute for
Environmental Conflict Resolution, an organization chartered by
Congress for the purpose of resolving multi-party environmental issues
and disputes. Because the Giant Sequoia National Monument is a unique
treasure of international interest, it deserves the very best planning
approach possible. We believe that the very best management will result
from this innovative, collaborative approach which taps the knowledge
and creative energy of those who know and love the giant sequoias.
In the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process terms, this
Notice of Intent initiates the scoping period. We expect the scoping
period to last up to one year during which there will be a variety of
meetings and workshops. The collaborative process will thereby be the
focus, but not the sole means, of this extended scoping period during
which the proposed action will be developed and planning issues
identified. Notification of scoping activities will be posted on the
Web site, http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/sequoia/gsnm, and advertised through
the media. The collaborative process will continue to play a role
through development of the draft and final environmental impact
statements.
Current Management Direction
Until a new Monument Management Plan is implemented, current
management direction for the GSNM includes the Presidential
Proclamation, the Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan, as amended by the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment (2001), and
the Mediated Settlement Agreement.
Commenting
Comments received in response to public scoping or any future
solicitation for public comments on a draft EIS, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public
record and will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and considered. Additionally, pursuant to
7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality. Persons requesting
such confidentiality should be aware that under the FOIA
confidentiality may be granted in only very limited circumstances, such
as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service will inform the
requester of the agency's decision regarding the request for
confidentiality, and where the request is denied; the agency will
return the submission and notify the requester that the comments may be
resubmitted with or without name and address.
The comment period on the draft EIS will be 90 days from the date
the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes that, at this early stage, it is very
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts the agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 533 (1978). Also, environmental
objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage, but that are not raised until
after completion of the final EIS, may be waived or dismissed by the
courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986)
and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334 (E.D. Wis.
1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that
persons interested in this proposed action participate by the close of
the 90-day comment period on the draft EIS so that substantive comments
and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when
it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specified as possible. It
is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy or the merits
of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement.
Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
RETURN TO:
News Releases
AVA Home Page